Описание исследования

Заказать уникальное эссе
Тип работы: Эссе
Предмет: Социология общая
  • 18 18 страниц
  • 0 + 0 источников
  • Добавлена 04.01.2016
299 руб.
  • Содержание
  • Часть работы
  • Список литературы
  • Вопросы/Ответы
-
Фрагмент для ознакомления

It is difficult, first of all, because the society is not ready for it either intellectually or morally.
The study may give an answer to the question - how much moral society is ready for that, to be able to work out with the perpetrators as "non-human", as such, is not a member of society. Such moral paradigm will be developed, but probably not soon.


9.2 A separate discussion of each method
During the interview the sociologist must take into account the attitude of the respondent to the survey the situation. In a properly conducted interview is always an element of external influence. In some cases, the conversation may be aimed at changing attitudes and relationships of the respondent, ie be corrective in nature.
Individual ethical significance acquire such working points, as a simple re - answering, ie please repeat this or that word, because it draws attention to what was said or done; approval or stimulate further action, such as "good", "continue"; as well as questions about why the respondent insists that a particular opinion (such questions help him clarify his own thoughts).
In the process of policy analysis counter burglaries is necessary to pay attention to such ethical aspects of how to achieve that category of policy analysis counter burglaries were:
• appropriate, that is consistent with the decision of research problems;
• exhaustive, ie adequately reflect the meaning of the basic concepts of the study;
• mutually exclusive (the same content is not to go into various categories in the same amount);
• reliable, that is, those that would not cause disagreement among researchers about what should be classified as a category in the analysis document.
9.3 Ethical problems that can be solved in the course of the study
The most important ethical problem of sociological research has been and remains the anonymity of respondents. Respondent anonymous, if the researcher can not identify the answers to this particular person. However, not a lot of sociological methods give this opportunity .. At the same time, the mail survey provides this capability, unless, of course, a researcher pre-ns numbered their profiles to identify the address. Group survey of victims (victims) of burglary by self-filling questionnaires under certain conditions, can also be anonymous.
The second problem - confidentiality. In this case, the researcher can identify the respondent, but agrees not to do it in public (Not to transfer the information to others, outside the research team). This means that the investigator must provide for measures to guarantee anonymity. In practice, it is often time-consuming matter that requires great care and attention. Consider the situation fairly standard poll respondent at home. Interview EP, interviews with a respondent, has a fairly extensive information about this person - gender, age, social status, where he worked, income, and a lot of other personal information. And besides, he knows where this man lives, and this address is registered in one of the Entrance of documents (for example, the search form of the respondent). All of this is transferred to the Department of Field Research Center. The address is used mainly to monitor the work of the interviewer and then destroyed. The panel study addresses of respondents to be stored throughout the research cycle, which can reach many years.
The third problem - it is the legal immunity of the respondent. Conviction of any criminal gang boss often depends on the garden of the relevant evidence by one of his accomplices. Given the fact that criminals are ruthless in taking revenge on those who not only gives evidence against them to the police, but also prepared to appear in court for the prosecution, it is necessary to take elaborate measures to protect such respondents. In order to provide this kind of evidence in relation to the informant establishes the legal immunity.
10. The use of secondary data (5 points)
10.1 Estimated possibility of using secondary data
The study, based on secondary analysis to adhere to the following scheme:
1) clearly define the specifics of the research problem;
2) to prepare a preliminary plan for the research;
3) select the appropriate data in accordance with the research problem;
4) to conduct the primary analysis (for example, to encode the data, if they are archived in the initial state). Correct coding and inventory of materials are particularly relevant, if the data are heterogeneous (letters, interviews, numeric data, etc.) and collected for other purposes;
5) carry out the necessary data conversion;
6) To assess the completeness of the data and, where necessary, conduct an additional search or data collection.
10.2 Using the policy reports
Effective use of reports on anti-crime policies in the case study involves a thorough examination of selected materials in order to assess their relevance, completeness, reliability, availability.
Data source (archive) - must be reliable, you should make a detailed description of the input data and the procedures that were used to bring the data in line with current research objectives. For correct use of secondary data is important to have the fullest possible picture of the original study (about the peculiarities of sampling, methods of collecting data on the qualifications of the research organizations, etc.). This helps to identify potential mistakes predecessors in varying stages of data collection, which will allow them to evaluate and possibly adjust.
10.3 The use of media (text)
Using the media is seen primarily as channels of sociological data analysis method. Sociological analysis of media can be evaluated as a form of social communication. Collecting information and forming an opinion of the respondents in the survey also depends on the information broadcasted through media channels about the burglary.
10.4 The quality and quantity of sources used
The quality of the sources used is determined by the following criteria:
1. points - the truth, objectivity, competence, scientific, reliability, validity, completeness, accuracy, timeliness, consistency, usefulness, representation, efficiency, conciseness, clarity, and so on. Undoubtedly, all these signs are important and essential characterizes social information. But the definition of the relevant properties and qualities data in scientific research is difficult because of the uncertainty of their content, logic and heuristic capabilities. In fact, it is easy to see that the above list does not have a common base, some of the indicators equals to content or overlap volumes. Himself a list can be extended or cut without much damage to the fullness of the expression meaning. Meanwhile, the specific practical and theoretical problem of using social information required and specific, according to a single base classification the criteria, that apply to it.
10.5 Criteria for the selection of sources
Sources of secondary information should be selected for this study based on the following criteria:
1. Sources of providing reliable information
2. Sources Hotels chronologically quality valid information (information which is currently not obsolete)
3. Sources of providing relevant information (information directly related to the problem of the present study).
11. Evaluation of costs (5 points)
1. Time - six calendar months
2. The team of the - 25 - 30 employees.
3. Finances - about 2700 pounds
12. The use of language for writing research (5 points)
12.1 Grammar - presentation of the results of this study in writing involves the implementation of the requirements of English grammar in the part except for the following types of errors: spelling errors and typos. Spelling errors are a violation of the rules of spelling, the requirements stipulated by the rules of spelling, language or tradition. Clerical - a consequence of the distortion sound image of the word; they are not bound to the rules of orthography (the permutation of letters, pass them, and so on. n.). Clerical errors indicate inattention, victim intentions. Clerical necessarily corrected and taken into account when evaluating the work as a whole.
12.2 Syntax - all the proposals in the text of presentation of the results of this study should be related sequences within the meaning of the words and grammatically, the first of which begins with a capital letter, and after the last is a punctuation mark (period, question mark, or exclamation mark). All offers include information about someone or something. That someone or something called the sentence subject. In English, the subject is usually in the beginning of the sentence: predicate says that does one or the other thing, what he said. Typically, the predicate is just behind the subject. A simple subject - the main subject in a sentence, a simple predicate - is the main verb. Simple subject always expressed noun or pronoun, but a simple predicate - only the verb.
Simple subjects and predicates may consist of two or more words: what or whom it is written, and that this someone / something to do. The style of writing would be more readable if the subject does not come first in every sentence. Each complex sentence consists of a few simple, which allow to characterize it. So, a simple sentence - is one that contains a single grammatical basis (subject and predicate).
12.3 Spelling - Spelling English language requirements must be maintained in compliance with all of the following spelling rules: when you add a word to the end «-ll» suffix «-ful», one consonant is omitted: Will + ful = willful Adding a suffix beginning with a vowel (-ed , -ing, -er, etc.), by the way with the unreadable «e» at the end of this letter, too, disappears: Love + ed = loved If the way to the unreadable «e» at the end joins suffix beginning with a consonant ( -ment, -ful, -ly, -ness, etc.), the «e» is stored: Engage + ment = engagement. Exceptions: awful, wholly, duly, truly monosyllabic word doubles final consonant, if it ends in a vowel + consonant, and the added suffix. It begins with a vowel: Cut + ing = cutting, Rob + er = robber monosyllabic word does not double the last letter, if added to the same suffix., and the word ends in two consonants and vowels: Wish + ed = wished saved «e», when added «-ous» and «-able» the way to «-ge» or «-ce»: Courage + ous = courageous, Change + able = changeable adding suf-sy, the words on the «-ee» do not lose anything: Agree + ment = agreement, See + ing = seeing Units, with the end of «y» accession suf., starting at acc. Replaced by «i»: Carry + ed = carried, Beauty + ful = beautiful Conversely, adding «-ing», end «-ie», changed to «y»: Lie + ing = lying, Die + ing = dying Words from the last consonant and «y», allying «-ing» preserve «y»: Marry + ing = marrying.
12.4 Punctuation - presentation of the results of this study in writing, shall comply with the following rules of punctuation of the English language: a simple sentence, a comma is placed:
1 In the listing for the separation of homogeneous parts of the sentence. Comma, in contrast to the Russian language can be put (but not necessarily) before the last of three or more members in uniform when he is faced with the union and. If the last item listing is longer than the previous ones, it is usually always put a comma.
2 To highlight, as in English, the introductory words, phrases, sentences and input where necessary to avoid ambiguity in understanding:
3 To separate, as in the English language applications with explanatory words, standing after the noun:
4 To select an independent participial phrase:
5 After the introductory words to direct speech:
6 To select a treatment, as well as in English. After treatment at the beginning of the letter a comma, in contrast to the English language, which in this case is put an exclamation mark: The end of the letter to the signature after the final phrase as a comma:
7 In the notation of the date of separation from the year:
8 For the separation of part of the address (the name of the addressee, street, city, postal district, country).
12.5 Clarity of expression: clear communication in English is called a speech that the reader can easily understand and that does not excite him any misunderstandings. To clearly express thoughts, it is necessary to have a clear idea about the subject. In particular, the clarity of speech harms the use of so-called ambiguous expressions. The ambiguity of expression may depend on:
a) on the same subject endings and a direct object.
b) The ambiguity of expression may be due to the omission of punctuation
c) The ambiguity of expression easily reported use of homonyms, ie words denoting several completely different concepts.











18

-

Вопрос-ответ:

Почему общество не готово интеллектуально и морально к такому исследованию?

Общество не готово интеллектуально и морально к такому исследованию, в первую очередь потому что оно не имеет достаточного уровня понимания и осознания данной тематики. Также, моральные принципы и ценности общества пока не разработаны в достаточной степени, чтобы рассматривать преступников как нечленов общества.

О каком вопросе может дать ответ данное исследование?

Данное исследование может дать ответ на вопрос о том, насколько общество морально готово работать с преступниками, рассматривая их как нелюдей. Путем проведения исследования можно определить, насколько возможно разработать такую моральную парадигму, хотя это, вероятно, займет некоторое время.

Какие методы использовались в данном исследовании?

Данное исследование позволяет провести отдельное обсуждение каждого метода. Один из методов исследования - это интервью с социологом. При проведении интервью социолог должен учитывать отношение людей к данной теме, а также их восприятие преступников как отдельной категории людей. Интервью может дать глубокий и разносторонний анализ мнений и взглядов общества на данную проблему.

Можете ли вы предположить, когда будет разработана моральная парадигма, рассматривающая преступников как нечленов общества?

Точно сказать, когда будет разработана такая моральная парадигма, сложно. Это процесс, который требует времени и обсуждения со стороны множества людей. Вероятно, разработка такой парадигмы займет некоторое время, так как она связана с изменением моральных ценностей и принципов всего общества.

Какие факторы необходимо учитывать при проведении интервью социологом?

При проведении интервью социологом необходимо учитывать отношение людей к данной теме и восприятие преступников как нелюдей. Важно понимать, какие факторы влияют на формирование мнений и взглядов общества на данную проблему. Также, нужно учесть, что восприятие и отношение могут различаться у разных групп людей, в зависимости от их социального статуса, образования и других факторов.

Сколько времени может занять разработка моральной парадигмы, где преступники рассматриваются как нечеловеческие существа?

Разработка моральной парадигмы, где преступники рассматриваются как нечеловеческие существа, может занять длительное время. Возможно, что такая парадигма будет разработана в будущем, но точные сроки сложно определить. Это зависит от готовности общества как интеллектуально, так и морально принять такой подход.

Что именно может дать исследование по данной теме обществу?

Исследование может дать ответ на вопрос о том, насколько морально готово общество принять такой подход к работе с преступниками, рассматривая их как нечеловеческие существа. Такое исследование может помочь разработать моральную парадигму, которая учитывает отношение общества к преступникам и позволяет работать с ними.

Какую роль должен играть социолог при проведении интервью в рамках данного исследования?

При проведении интервью социологу необходимо учитывать отношение людей к данной теме. Он должен быть внимателен к мнениям и реакциям интервьюируемых и уметь адаптировать свои вопросы и подход к ним в соответствии с этим. Социолог должен создать доверительную обстановку, чтобы получить максимально достоверные ответы и понять общественное мнение на данную тему.

Почему общество не готово интеллектуально и морально принять рассмотрение преступников как нечеловеческих существ?

Общество не готово интеллектуально и морально принять рассмотрение преступников как нечеловеческих существ по нескольким причинам. Во-первых, это может вызвать этические и философские дебаты о природе человеческой сущности и правах преступников. Во-вторых, такой подход может быть вопринят как нарушение прав человека и безнадежные попытки изолирования определенной части общества. Необходимо время и дальнейшее обсуждение, чтобы наладить консенсус по данному вопросу.

Какие методы используются в данном исследовании?

В данном исследовании используется метод интервью. Социолог проводит интервью с людьми, чтобы выяснить их мнение и отношение к рассмотрению преступников как нечеловеческих существ. Этот метод позволяет получить более глубокие и детальные ответы и понять общественное мнение на данную тему.

Что изучает данное исследование?

Данное исследование изучает готовность общества к принятию новой моральной парадигмы, в которой преступники не рассматриваются как члены общества.

Почему исследование является сложным?

Исследование сложно в первую очередь потому, что общество не готово к нему ни интеллектуально, ни морально.