Вариативность системы вокализма британского варианта английского языка

As linguistic shifts continue, research in this area remains crucial for understanding the intricate relationship between language, culture, and society.The current changes within the system of British English vowels reflect broader trends in language evolution and the evolving attitudes towards linguistic diversity. These changes are a testament to the living nature of language and its ability to adapt, innovate, and express the multifaceted identities of its speakers.The previously considered features of the vocalism of the British version of the English language allow us to say that the quantitative and qualitative changes are quite diverse and therefore interesting to study.Moreover, it is necessary to consider the features of the vowels of British English not only through a historical prism, but also a linguistic one in order to better understand their purpose in the language.3.1 Qualitative changesThe most profound alterations within the English sound system have taken place in the realm of stressed syllable vowels. These transformations encompass both changes in sound quality and duration, influenced by various factors and occurring independently or in conjunction with neighboring sounds. In essence, no long monophthongs or diphthongs from Old English have remained untouched over time; only a few short vowels have remained unchanged, unless they were lengthened and then subjected to the fate of their long counterparts. The structure of vowel phonemes has experienced substantial modifications throughout the history of the English language. While the overall count of phonemes has largely remained constant, their distinct characteristics and the principles governing their differentiation within the system have evolved.In truth, vowel changes have been present in all historical periods, although certain predominant evolutionary patterns can be identified within specific vowel groups during particular eras. Notably, long vowels have proven to be the most variable and historically unstable category of English sounds. Across all periods, they have displayed a consistent inclination to narrow down and evolve into diphthongs. Conversely, short vowels have demonstrated an opposite tendency – a move towards greater openness, although this trend has been less apparent and less uniform. Qualitative and quantitative alterations have often occurred simultaneously and intertwined throughout this process.One notable change is the "trap-bath" split, where historically similar vowel sounds in words like "trap" and "bath" have diverged. The "trap" vowel has moved towards a sound closer to [a], while the "bath" vowel has shifted towards [ɑː]. This split is particularly pronounced in some accents of Southern British English[Медведева 2016].Another significant change is the "lot-cloth" split, affecting vowels in words like "lot" and "cloth." The "lot" vowel has moved closer to [ɒ], while the "cloth" vowel has shifted towards [ɔː]. This split is more prevalent in Northern British English accents.The "foot-strut" split is another ongoing change, influencing vowels in words like "foot" and "strut." The "foot" vowel has shifted towards [ʊ], while the "strut" vowel has moved closer to [ʌ].The "price-choice" split involves the vowels in words like "price" and "choice." The "price" vowel has shifted towards [aɪ], while the "choice" vowel has moved towards [ɔɪ].These contemporary qualitative changes within the British English vowel system are influenced by various factors, including regional accents, social interactions, and language contact, highlighting the dynamic nature of language evolution.In conclusion, the current qualitative changes within the system of British English vowels reflect the dynamic nature of language evolution. These changes involve shifts in the quality or timbre of vowel sounds, impacting the distinctiveness of words and overall communication. Factors such as language contact, social influences, technological advancements, and globalization play significant roles in driving these qualitative shifts. While some changes might be subtle and gradual, others can be more pronounced, leading to shifts in pronunciation patterns and contributing to linguistic diversity. The study of these qualitative changes not only enhances our understanding of language variation but also sheds light on how languages adapt to the evolving contexts in which they are used.3.2Quantitative changesThe current quantitative changes within the system of British English vowels involve alterations in the duration or length of vowel sounds. These changes can be observed in the way certain vowels are pronounced in comparison to their historical forms. While vowel quality refers to the sound quality or timbre of a vowel, vowel quantity relates to its duration. In modern British English, certain vowels have experienced changes in their duration, which can impact their phonetic characteristics and their role in differentiating words. These changes can result from a variety of linguistic, social, and regional factors. Studying these quantitative changes provides insights into the ongoing evolution of the British English vowel system and its adaptation to contemporary linguistic environments[Шевченко 2007].In addition to the main sources of long monophthongs and diphthongs in Early NE, such as the Great Vowel Shift and the vocalisation of the sonorant [r], there were a few other instances of the growth of long vowels from short ones in some phonetic conditions. These lengthenings resemble Early ME quantitative vowel changes before consonant groups; only this time the consonant sequences which brought about the lengthening were different: ss, nt, ft, st; the sequences mainly affected the vowel [a], e.g. ME plant [plant] > NE plant [pla:nt], ME after [after] > NE after [a:fter]. The reverse quantitative change – shortening of vowels – occurred in Early NE before single dental and velar consonants [θ, d, t, k]. The long vowels subjected to this shortening were [e:] and [u:] which were changing, or had already changed under the Great Vowel Shift, e. g. ME breeth [bre:θ]  became [breθ]; likewise, ME deed [de:d ] was shortened to NE dead [ded]. The long [u:] became short before [k], and sometimes also before [t] and was a product of the shift; this is evidenced by the spelling of such words as book, foot, where long ME [o:] changed into [u:] as a result of the Great Vowel Shift and then was shortened to [u].In conclusion, the current quantitative changes within the system of British English vowels demonstrate the ongoing evolution and adaptation of language. These changes, characterized by shifts in vowel durations and vowel reduction patterns, are influenced by a combination of linguistic, social, and cultural factors. The interaction between native speakers and non-native speakers, as well as the impact of technological communication and globalization, contributes to the dynamic nature of these quantitative shifts. While some changes may be more subtle, others can be significant enough to alter the rhythm and flow of speech. The study of these quantitative changes provides valuable insights into how language responds to changing environments and how linguistic systems continue to adjust over time.ConclusionLanguage variation is a fascinating and complex phenomenon that highlights the diversity and adaptability of human communication. It encompasses a wide range of factors, including regional, social, and historical influences, as well as individual idiosyncrasies. Language variation manifests in various forms, such as accents, dialects, and sociolects, each reflecting the unique characteristics of different speech communities.The study of language variation offers valuable insights into the intricate relationship between language and society. It enables linguists to explore how linguistic choices are shaped by factors like geography, social status, and cultural identity. Additionally, understanding language variation contributes to effective communication and language teaching, as it emphasizes the importance of linguistic flexibility and the appreciation of diverse ways of speaking.Furthermore, the advent of globalization and digital communication platforms has expanded the scope of language variation, introducing new dimensions to the way languages evolve and interact. As languages continue to adapt and transform in response to changing social dynamics and technological advancements, the study of language variation remains a dynamic and essential area of linguistic research. Overall, language variation showcases the richness and complexity of human linguistic expression, highlighting the interconnectedness of language, culture, and society.The Standard British English accent, commonly known as Received Pronunciation (RP), has a rich and complex history that spans centuries. It evolved from various linguistic and social influences, ultimately gaining prestige and recognition as a marker of education and social status. RP is characterized by its distinct phonological features, including vowel quality and consonant sounds, which set it apart from other regional accents within the United Kingdom.While RP was historically associated with the upper classes and elite, its role as a standard has evolved over time. Variations and shifts in societal norms have led to the recognition of different accents as markers of identity and authenticity. This has led to discussions about the importance of linguistic diversity and the acceptance of various accents in contemporary society.RP's influence extends beyond the United Kingdom due to historical colonial ties and the role of English as a global lingua franca. While RP is still taught and used as a model for teaching English pronunciation, the linguistic landscape has become more inclusive, recognizing and valuing diverse accents and varieties of English.Received Pronunciation continues to be a significant aspect of the British linguistic landscape. While its prestige and influence have evolved, it remains a topic of linguistic interest, social discussion, and cultural identity. The study of RP sheds light on the intricate relationship between language, society, and identity, reflecting the dynamic nature of linguistic phenomena and their societal implications.The current changes within the system of British English vowels highlight the dynamic nature of language and the ongoing evolution of linguistic patterns. These changes are driven by a complex interplay of linguistic, social, and cultural factors. The transition from traditional RP to more contemporary variants reflects a broader trend of linguistic democratization and the recognition of diverse accents as valid expressions of identity.The impact of globalization and increased exposure to various English accents from around the world has contributed to a blending of linguistic features and the emergence of hybrid accents. This phenomenon underscores the adaptability of language and its capacity to reflect the interconnectedness of societies in the modern era.Moreover, the recognition of local accents and the celebration of linguistic diversity challenge traditional notions of linguistic hierarchy and standardization. As regional accents gain prominence and representation in media, education, and public discourse, they contribute to a richer and more inclusive linguistic landscape.However, it's important to note that language change is not uniform across all speakers or regions, and there will likely always be variability in how different individuals adopt and adapt these changes. As linguistic shifts continue, research in this area remains crucial for understanding the intricate relationship between language, culture, and society.The current changes within the system of British English vowels reflect broader trends in language evolution and the evolving attitudes towards linguistic diversity. These changes are a testament to the living nature of language and its ability to adapt, innovate, and express the multifaceted identities of its speakers.List of referencesBergsA. and Brinton L. Historical Linguistics of English, de Gruyter, 2012, pp. 589–604Chambers, J.K. Sociolinguistic theory: linguistic Variation and its social significance. – Oxford: Blackwell, 2009. – 308p.Cruttenden, A. Gimson's Pronunciation of English, 7ed. – London: Hodder Education, 2008. – 362 p. Hannisdal, B.R. Variability and change in Received Pronunciation: A study of six phonological variables in the speech of television newsreaders. – Bergen: University of Bergen, 2006.Hawkins, S., Midgley, J. Formant Frequencies of RP Monophthongs in Four Age Groups of Speakers // Journal of the International Phonetic Association. – Cambridge Univ. Press,Vol.35., No.2. – December, 2005. – P. 183–199. Hudson, R. A. Sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Gimson, A.C. British English pronunciation: standards and evolution. Praxis des NeusprachlichenUnterrichts 17, 1970. – pp. 17-20.Gimson, A.C. Phonetic change and the RP vowel system., London: Longman. 1964. – pp. 131-136.Kerswill, P., Torgersen, E.N. and Fox, S. Reversing «drift»: Innovation and Diffusion in the London Diphthong System// Language Variation and Change, Vol.20. – Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008. – P.451-491.Labov, W. Principles of Linguistic Change, vol.2, Social Factors. – Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001. – 572 p. Raymond Mougeon et al., The Sociolinguistic Competence of Immersion Students. Multilingual Matters, 2010Trudgill, P. Sociolinguistics: an introduction to language and society. – London: Penguin, 2000. – 228 p. Wells, J. С Pronunciation preferences in British English: a new survey. Proc. of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, 1999.Wells, J.C. Accents of English. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.–1982. – 465 p. Wells, J.C. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. New edition. – L.: Longman, 2000.Wyld, H.C. A history of modern colloquial English. – L.: T.F. Unwin, 1920.Безбородова М.В. «Фонетический анализ системы вокализма». Вестник Московского государственного лингвистическогоуниверситета. Языкознание и литературоведение. − 2015. Вып. 15 (726). Экспериментально-аналитические тренды в современной теоретической и прикладной лингвистике. – С. 40– 49. Безбородова М.В. Вокалическая составляющая современной молодежной речи с учетом гендерных различий (экспериментально-фонетическое исследование на материале британского варианта английского языка): Автореферат дис. … канд. филол. наук. –M, 2013.Безбородова М.В. Особенности вокалической составляющей речи молодых британцев // Социофонетика звучащей речи. Языкознание. Вестник МГЛУ; вып.1 (607) – М.: Изд-во МГЛУ, 2011. – С. 37 – 53.Киселев В.В., Коршунов Д.В.ReceivedPronunciation как языковой стандарт британского английского: история и эволюция // Вестник Амурского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2015. №68. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/received-pronunciation-kak-yazykovoy-standart-britanskogo-angliyskogo-istoriya-i-evolyutsiya (дата обращения: 23.08.2023).Медведева Т.В., Безбородова М.В. «Изменения в современной системе британского произносительного стандарта (на примере вокализма)» Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Языкознание. – 2016. – Вып. 15 (754). Прагмалингвистическое многоголосие.Шевченко Т.И. Тенденции, проверенные временем: гласные, согласные и просодия английского языка// Фонетическая вариативность современной английской речи. Вестн. Моск. гос. лингв, ун-та; вып. 523 – М.: Изд-во МГЛУ, 2007. – С. 182 – 191. Шевченко Т.И. Фонетика и фонология английского языка: Курс теоретической фонетики английского языка для бакалавров // Дубна., Феникс+, 2011.–74–75 с.Языковая вариативность английского языка Великобритании, США и Канады: Монография / Ж. Багана, А.Н. Безрукая, Е.Н. Таранова. М.: НИЦ ИНФРА–М, 2014. 124 с.